CCT

Claims Combination Test

The Claims Combination Test is used when your product has several claims. To learn more about Claims and Claims Testing, please refer to our article on claims testing for consumer goods. We’ve created the Claims Combination Test using a methodology perfected over numerous projects with FMCG brands, allowing you to find the best combinations of claims from a list of up to 100 individual claims ranked on preference share.

Conjointly’s unique methodology:

  • Leverages a unique twist on choice-based experimental design to simultaneously provide insights on product features and pricing.
  • Simulates preference share to compare performance of different claims combinations against competitors.
  • Offers various diagnostic options to measure how well claims perform on standard measures, e.g. attractiveness, naturalness – or your own metrics.
Hero image

Using Claims Combination Test to assess claims in combinations of 3 along different levels of pricing.

View case study

Respondents are asked to choose between one of four claims, arranged in various combinations.

Take example survey

Claims Combination Test surveys can be automatically translated to more than 30 languages.

View translations

Bring your own respondents or buy quality-assured panel respondents from us.

Get respondents

Key outputs

Ranking of singular claims by preference

Ranking of Singular Claims by Preference

This example shows that whilst Benefits tend to outperform RTBs, the top five claims are a mixture of both.
Examining claims correlation

Examining Claims Correlation

Our example of claims correlation suggests that RTBs are interchangeable, but different benefits can be used to appeal to different sections of the audience.
Simulating preference share

Simulating Preference Share

Preference share simulation showing the example product with different claims combinations identified the top claims combinations.

Analysing the top ten claims combinations

Analysing the Top Ten Claims Combinations

The share of preference in our example show shows that using claims combinations across both Benefits and RTBs takes the highest preference share.

Simulating volume/preference shares

Simulating Volume/Preference Shares

In this example, simulated/volume preference shares indicate that market share and revenue is maximised at $3.00 whilst profitability is maximised at $3.50.
Analysis of source of business

Analysis of Source of Business

Our analysis of source of business shows which competitors our brand (BrandCo) would take the most preference share from.

Single Claims Test vs. Claims Combination Test

Claims Test produces lists of the top combinations of claims through TURF analysis that “reach” the largest number of customers. This can be problematic when testing combinations as TURF may recommend several claims that serve a similar purpose which can be detrimental to the effectiveness of the messaging.

Claims Combination Test ranks claims combinations on simulated preference share, giving a direct answer to the question of which claims combinations will get the most people interested in your product.

Combination claims test vs single claims test

Inputs

A list of competitor products provided by BrandCo to test their claims against, including product images, current claims, and prices.

List of BrandCo's competitor claims

BrandCo also provided 15 claims to be tested organised into two topics: Benefits and Reasons to Believe (RTBs).

List of BrandCo's claims

Survey flow

Unlike standard conjoint testing, a Combination Test allows claims to be arranged flexibly in various combinations, and more rules can be used to sort claims.

Commonly, this test is done in two stages:

Stage 1: BrandCo claims were tested against competitors’ claims to find the claims most effective at taking market share.

Comparing BrandCo claims against competitor claims

Stage 2: BrandCo claims were tested against each other to “sort” claims and refine combinations.

Comparing BrandCo claims against competitor claims

SURV

Survey Tool

Fully-functional online survey tool with various question types, logic, randomisation, and reporting for unlimited number of responses and surveys.

GC
Range optimisation
Features and claims

Generic Conjoint

Feature and claim selection and measuring willingness to pay for features for a single product.

MD
Range optimisation
Features and claims

MaxDiff Analysis

MaxDiff (aka Maximum Difference Scaling or Best–Worst Scaling) is a statistical technique that creates a robust ranking of different items, such as product features.

CT
Features and claims

Claims Test

Efficiently test up to 300 product claims on customer appeal, fit with brand, and diagnostic questions of your choice.

BSC
Pricing research
Range optimisation

Brand-Specific Conjoint

Pricing, feature and claim selection in markets where product characteristics vary across brands, SKUs, or price tiers.

PVS
Range optimisation

Product Variant Selector

Identify winning product variants from up to 300 different ideas (e.g., designs, materials, bundle options) on customer appeal, fit with brand, and diagnostic questions of your choice.

BPTO
Pricing research

Brand-Price Trade-Off

Test pricing of new and existing consumer goods in a competitive context using elasticity charts, revenue, and profitability projections.

GG
Pricing research

Gabor-Granger Pricing Method

Determine price elasticity for a single product and identify revenue-maximising price level.

VW
Pricing research

Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter

The Price Sensitivity Meter helps determine psychologically acceptable range of prices for a single product and approximately estimate price elasticity.

AB
Concept testing

A/B Test

Perform focussed comparisons between two items to determine which performs better.

MT
Concept testing

Monadic Test

Ask respondents to evaluate product concepts and digital assets one-by-one to get a read of their preferences and perceptions with various question types.

DAT
Concept testing

Digital Asset Test

Test the effectiveness of your digital advertisements in an online environment

IT
Concept testing

Image Test

Test the effectiveness of your images in an online environment

BNE
One-Click Market Research

Business Name Evaluator

Efficiently evaluate potential business names to identify the best one to represent your brand

IAT
One-Click Market Research

Image Ad Test

Efficiently test potential images to identify the best one for your ads

ACT
One-Click Market Research

Ad Copy Test

Efficiently test ad copy to identify the best one for your campaign

BNT
One-Click Market Research

Brand Name Test

Efficiently test potential brand names to identify the best one to represent your business

PDT
Concept testing

Product Description Test

Validate your product descriptions before release

DNLC
One-Click Market Research

Domain Name Likability Check

Efficiently test potential domain names to identify the perfect new home for your brand

PAT
One-Click Market Research

Print Ad Test

Efficiently test print ads to identify the best one for your campaign

VT
Concept testing

Video Test

Test the effectiveness of your videos in an online environment

IS
Concept testing

Idea Screener

Perform preliminary screening to find your best product ideas.

OOH
One-Click Market Research

Out-of-Home Ad Test

Efficiently test out-of-home ads to identify the best one for your campaign

PNT
One-Click Market Research

Product Name Test

Efficiently test potential product names to identify the best one to reflect your brand

BCD
One-Click Market Research

Business Card Design Test

Efficiently test potential business card designs to identify the best one for your business

LT
One-Click Market Research

Logo Test

Efficiently test potential logos to identify the best one for your ads

PT
One-Click Market Research

Package Test

Efficiently test packages to identify the best one for your product

PCT
One-Click Market Research

Product Concept Test

Efficiently test product concepts to identify the best one for your business

GDF
One-Click Market Research

Graphic Design Feedback

Efficiently test graphic designs to identify the best one for your brand

TURF
Range optimisation
Features and claims

TURF Analysis Simulator

Conduct automated TURF analysis on results of any Conjointly experiment (or an outside dataset) using this user-friendly TURF analysis tool.

DIY

DIY Experimental Design

Allowing advanced choice modellers to upload their own experimental designs and perform data collection on Conjointly.

KANO
Features and claims
Feature and Pricing Suite for SaaS

Kano Model

Ensure product-market fit and maximise your user acquisition and expansion, by differentiating software features according to your users' needs.