Synthesising selected responses of individual respondents


Deep probe is currently an α alpha feature. Have you got any suggestions for how we can improve the functionality? We are always looking for feedback, so feel free to get in touch!

Survey reports typically show aggregated data across all participants, but understanding individual response patterns requires manually reviewing each person’s complete answers. Deep probe automates this process, synthesising individual participants’ responses to identify deeper insights into their specific preferences, behaviours, and characteristics.

The example below shows you how Deep probe can help you identify specific findings about individual respondents across all their responses.

Working example: Understanding financial concerns of respondents

A fast food chain surveyed 202 customers about their dining habits and concerns. Rather than just seeing overall trends, they wanted to understand each customer’s specific financial concerns to better inform their overall pricing strategy.

Case example : Understanding financial concerns of respondents

To save time from going through individual respondent answers, Deep probe’s LLM analysis was used to summarise the primary reason for reach respondent.

Deep probe setup

  1. Navigate to the Deep probe tab in the experiment report and click Add a deep probe .
  2. Select Add LLM analysis .
  3. Describe what you want to learn about each respondent. For example, What is the primary financial or economic concern of this respondent?
  4. The system suggests categories as output type with options such as “Personal financial strain”, “Increased fast food prices”, “Delivery fee concerns”, etc. However, after reviewing the suggested categories, researchers can accept the recommendations or modify them based on their analysis objectives. In this example, the researcher chose string as an output type to generate text summaries rather than categories.
Step-by-step setup

Generated prompt for synthesis

The system generates a prompt based on the settings. Final output quality depends on this prompt and LLM processing. Refine the prompt and preview results to ensure it captures what you want to discover before processing begins.

The following shows an example prompt generated by the LLM based on the request in this example.

Request: What is the primary financial or economic concern of this respondent?

Response:

You are analyzing an individual survey respondent for a deep probe analysis. Your objective is to identify the primary financial or economic concerns of this specific respondent based on their answers to the following questions:

  1. Personal finances and fast food habits : answer(Q5: Personal finances and fast food habits)
  2. Fast food price impact : answer(Q4: Fast food price impact)
  3. Fast food delivery fees : answer(Q7: Fast food delivery fees)

Analyze this ONE participant's responses to these questions, looking for patterns and indications of their primary financial or economic concerns. Consider how their answers relate to topics such as personal financial strain, increased fast food prices, delivery fee concerns, budget prioritization, or if they show no significant financial concern.

Based on your analysis, generate a concise summary (1-2 sentences maximum) that captures the primary financial or economic concern of this specific respondent. Your summary should align with one or more of the following categories, but you should phrase it in your own words based on the respondent's specific answers:

  • Personal financial strain
  • Increased fast food prices
  • Delivery fee concerns
  • Budget prioritization
  • No significant financial concern

Provide your output in the following format:

[Your 1-2 sentence summary of the respondent’s primary financial or economic concern]

Ensure that your summary is specific to this individual respondent and based solely on the patterns observed in their responses to the given questions.


Outputs overview

In this case, the Deep probe generates a summary for each respondent. Please note that summarisation accuracy varies depending on prompt and LLM processing and cannot guarantee 100% accuracy. Conjointly recommends reviewing outputs and editing individual results where needed.

Reviewing the individual results

Based on these individual results, the Summary for string outputs tab presents the overall AI-generated summary identifying overall key themes and patterns across all responses.

Interpreting the results

Best practices for individual response synthesis

  • Analyse complete response sets rather than single questions to capture full participant context.
  • Define classification criteria that account for response consistency.
  • Include sufficient context in your request to guide accurate profiling.
  • Use meaningful category names that clearly communicate each conclusion for stakeholder understanding.
  • Layer multiple deep probe analyses to build comprehensive respondent profiles examining different dimensions.

Other example requests for individual respondent synthesis

Individual respondent synthesis extends beyond simple classification, enabling sophisticated participant profiling across multiple dimensions:

Example requestWhat it reveals
Does this response mention price or cost concerns?Budget sensitivity patterns across your customer base
What specific product features does this person discuss?Feature preferences and priority areas for development
Classify this response as positive, negative, or neutralOverall sentiment distribution in your responses
Does this response suggest the person is a frequent or occasional user?Usage behaviour segments within your audience
Summarise the primary needs of this respondentIndividual customer priorities

Other Deep probe use cases

You can also read about: