Case Study: Willingness to Pay For Ingredients

This disguised case study discusses the leading manufacturer's methodology used to understand willingness to pay for benefits of specialty ingredients.

Context and objectives

This disguised case study discusses a leading specialty health foods ingredient manufacturer, Ingredients Co., and the steps they took to understand willingness to pay for benefits of specialty ingredients. Please note that company names and figures used in this educational case study are fictional and have been disguised to ensure confidentiality.

Ingredients Co. is wanting to demonstrate the value of its ingredients to their customers (health food manufacturers), who in turn want to develop products that consumers will find valuable. Their insights manager wanted to better understand; willingness to pay, consumer pain points and how to take share from competing products.

These insights needs were then specified as the following three research questions:

  • RQ1: What is the willingness to pay for each of the benefits?
  • RQ2: Which consumer pain points are most frequently occurring and most difficult to resolve?
  • RQ3: Which Ingredients Co. ingredient has the greatest potential to take share from competing products?

Methodology

Each research question was addressed via a separate module and looked at from different angles.

  • Module 1 (Generic Conjoint) aimed to measure willingness to pay for benefits. In this module, we offered respondents choice of different benefits and associated price
  • Module 2 (MaxDiff) measured perceived frequency and severity of different consumer problems
  • Module 3 (Brand-Specific) aimed to identify the ingredients with greatest potential to take share from competitors (and with the current offering as a baseline)
Module 1: the willingness to pay

RQ1: What is the willingness to pay for each of the benefits?
Module 2: consumer pain points

RQ2: Which consumer pain points are most frequently occurring and most difficult to resolve?
Module 3: take share from competing products

RQ3: Which Ingredients Co. ingredient has the greatest potential to take share from competing products?

Module 1: Generic Conjoint

Ingredients Co. were able to discover both willingness to pay across all respondents and willingness to pay by user type by using Generic Conjoint

Marginal willingness to pay across all respondents
Willingness to pay across all respondents
Marginal willingness to pay by user type
Willingness to pay by user type

Module 2: MaxDiff

By using MaxDiff, Ingredients Co. were able to discover which consumer pain points are most frequently occurring and most difficult to resolve.

MaxDiff

Module 3: Brand-Specific Conjoint

Brand-Specific Conjoint was used to understand benefits that maximises share of preference for Ingredients Co. customers.

Brand-Specific Conjoint

Summary

In summary, by using the different angles of the three modules Ingredients Co. were able to identify the most valuable ingredients. Also, they were able to map the benefits and problems to ingredients, helping their insights manager successfully answer their research questions.

Ingredients Co. mapped benefits and problems to each ingredient…
Mapping benefits and problems to ingredients

And used different metrics to find the most valuable ingredients Most valuable ingredients

Schedule a consultation

Let us guide you through about measurement of willingness to pay for ingredients.


Written on 19 June 2019 by:
Nik Samoylov image
Nik Samoylov
Conjoint.ly Founder

Read these articles next:

Impact of TV ads on consumer purchase intent and price elasticity of demand

Case studies 17 October 2021

No matter the size of the business and whether it is run online or offline, finding an appropriate way to advertise your products or services increase your business’s potential for profitability. View article

Consumer Trends Survey: August 2021

COVID-19 Consumer Survey: August 2021

Case studies 1 September 2021

The August 2021 omnibus survey compares consumer trends against previous omnibus results. This omnibus continues to survey consumers within the UK and USA, however also includes Mexican consumers this round to gain a new perspective. View article

Gabor-Granger or Van Westendorp?

Gabor-Granger or Van Westendorp?

Pricing research Research tools 3 June 2018

With so many pricing research methodologies out there, how do you know which is the right one for you? View article