Comparing the new and old WH Smith Logo
WH Smith Trial Rebrand — New vs. Old
Published on
28 December 2023

To assess the impact of WH Smith's recent trial logo update, this Logo Test compares the newly introduced WHS logo with the WH Smith logo, which has been in use since 2004.


Just before 2023 wraps up, UK travel retailer WH Smith quietly introduced a logo change in select stores. The updated design now features only three white letters, ‘WHS,’ on a blue background, dropping ‘Smith’ for the first time since 1974.

The trial logo, however, has faced criticism from the media and online community:

To gauge the perception of US consumers towards the logos, a Logo Test was conducted, comparing the new WHS logo with its predecessor that has been in use since 2004.

Standard Assessments of Logo Test

Respondents clearly prefer the WH Smith logo over the new WHS logo, giving it significantly higher ratings across all tested metrics. In terms of overall performance, respondents perceive both logos as below average.

Company perception and emotion

Respondents give varied feedback about the industry represented by the logos, revealing that neither logo succeeds in portraying the company’s global travel retail industry. In addition, just 17% and 10% of respondents accurately identified the company’s origin through the respective logos.

The WH Smith logo elicits more positive feelings compared to the trial logo, with a higher number of respondents expressing contentment and fewer finding it confusing.

Open-ended feedback

Echoing the earlier discussions, the AI summaries of open-ended responses underscore that respondents don’t understand the logos and are not too excited about either of them.

Want to see how your logo performs? Launch your own Logo Test now!


Read these articles next:

Guidelines for conducting surveys with children

Best practice guidelines for conducting surveys with children

Learn how to design effective surveys for children by understanding cognitive development stages, optimising question formats, and minimising response bias to ensure valid and reliable data collection.

View article
New safeguards against bots and professional respondents

New safeguards against bots and "professional" respondents

Conjointly added two new quality checks i.e. extra hard exclusion rules and detection of anomalous network activities to protect your research from fraudulent respondents.

View article
Comparing different approaches to claims' diagnostics

Comparing different approaches to claims' diagnostics

You can perform diagnostic assessment on claims either through an individual claim approach or a combined concept approach, but which approach is more suitable?

View article